Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 2 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
FUTURE OF AL AQSA , AL QUDS AND FILISTEEN
#91



HAMAS CALLS ON PALESTINIANS TO CONGREGATE IN DEFENSE OF AL AQSA
Hamas issues a call for Palestinians to defend Al-Aqsa after a member of the Israeli Knesset proposed the construction of a "third temple" to replace the Mosque complex in occupied al-Quds.

https://english.almayadeen.net/news/poli...of-al-aqsa


ISLAMIC ENDOWMENT SLAMS ISRAEL's BEN-GVIR's PLANS TO CHANGE STATUS QUO AT AL AL AQSA MOSQUE AS A FLAGRANT VIOLATION
https://english.wafa.ps/Pages/Details/143314



FAR RIGHT ISRAELI MINISTER SETS FORMAL ACTION PLAN TO CHANGE AL AQSA MOSQUE STATUS QUO
https://www.anews.com.tr/middle-east/202...status-quo

According to the Israeli public broadcaster KAN, the plan proposed by far-right National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir aims to alter the status of the Al-Aqsa Mosque for Muslims worldwide. It involves granting Israeli control over the mosque and allowing access for Jewish worshippers.

BEN GVIR REPORTEDLY MAKES IT A MINISTRY POLICY TO CHANGE TEMPLE MOUNT STATUS QUO
https://www.timesofisrael.com/ben-gvir-r...tatus-quo/



ISRAELI CABINET REVOKE BEN GVIR's AUTHORITY OVER AL AQSA MOSQUE
Ben Gvir's previously approved plan to prohibit Palestinians from visiting Al-Aqsa during Ramadan has been retracted, as well as his authority over the mosque.
https://english.almayadeen.net/news/poli...qsa-mosque
Reply
#92
THE MORE ANYONE REVIEWS THE GAZA GENOCIDAL WAR THERE CAN ONLY BE ONE HUMAN RESPONSE. IT HAS TO BE RAGE, OUTRAGE AND RETRIBUTION. THE FACT THAT AFTER 200 DAYS THIS LIVESTREAM MASS SLAUGHTER OF UNARMED CIVILIANS ESPECIALLY WOMEN AND CHILDREN HAS INDEED  BEEN ALLOWED TO CONTINUE BY WESTERN POWERS AND ARAB COLLABORATORS. THE WESTERN PUBLIC NEED TO STOP BUSINESS AS USUAL AND STOP THINGS OPERATING AS NORMAL AS THIS IS BEING FUNDED AND DONE IN THEIR NAME. THAT IS THE LEAST THEY SHOULD DO AS GAZANS ARE BEING BOMBED DAILY RELENTLESSLY.

THERE IS ABSOLUTELY NO DOUBT THAT ISRAHELL HAS TURNED GAZA FROM A CONCENTRATION CAMP INTO A DEATH CAMP.   WHO SAID DEATH CAMP?  JUST WITNESS THOSE TV PICTURES SHOWING MASS GRAVES. THE DEPRAVITY OF THIS SATANIC REGIME ONLY REVEALS HOW LOW IT HAS FALLEN BY DENIAL AND BLAMING THE VICTIMS. AND STILL WE HEAR THAT THE ISRAHELL WAR CABINET WANTS MORE DEATH AND DESTRUCTION. AND THE BLESSED PEACEMAKERS LIKE THE USA AND EU WANT INVESTIGATION. INVESTIGATION  !   WHAT BLOODY INVESTIGATION AND WHY INVESTIGATION?  

IT IS CLEAR AS DAYLIGHT WHAT HAS HAPPENED. DAYLIGHT EXECUTION OF UNARMED CIVILIANS AND HEALTH WORKERS  IN HOSPITALS. THE EVIDENCE IS CLEAR THAT MANY WERE HANDCUFFED AND BRUTALLY EXECUTED.  FOLLOWED BY BULLDOZING DEAD CORPSES INTO MASS GRAVES. THAT IS THE IDF FOR YOU. A TERRORIST ARMY PAR EXCELLENCE. YET WE ARE FED GARBAGE IT IS DEFENDING WESTERN VALUES. THE ONLY VALUES IT IS PROMOTING ARE THOSE OF ETHNIC CLEANSING, GENOCIDE, COLLECTIVE PUNISHMENT AND LAND THEFT.

YET THE MSM  TURN A BLIND EYE TO THESE WAR CRIMES.   JUST THINK ABOUT WHAT HORRIFIC WAR CRIMES THESE ZIONAZIS HAVE COMMITTED. AND YES FUNDED BY WESTERN TAX PAYERS MONEY. LET US BE CLEAR WHAT WE ARE WATCHING IS FANATICAL EXTREMIST SATANIC ZIO-NAZIS OUT OF CONTROL AND ECSTATIC WITH JOY AS THEY ARE STILL BEING SUPPORTED BY THE USA AND WESTERN FINANCIAL AND MILITARY SPONSORSHIP OF THEIR SINKING SHIP. 

THESE PEOPLE SHOULD AND WILL INSHA ALLAH BE HELD TO ACCOUNT FOR EVERY ACTION AND MURDER THEY HAVE COMMITTED. THE WAR CRIMES THEY HAVE COMMITTED ON  THE PEOPLE OF OCCUPIED FILISTEEN WHO HAD THEIR LAND STOLEN AT GUNPOINT AND EVICTED INTO BANTUSTANS.  

THE YOUNG AMERICAN UNIVERSITY STUDENT GENERATION THAT ARE STARTING TO STIR ON AMERICAN CAMPUSES ARE  DOING THE RIGHT THING. ALTHOUGH THEY NEED TO BE SLAPPED TWICE FOR NOT GETTING OFF THEIR BACK SIDES UNTIL 200 DAYS OF A GENOCIDAL WAR FUNDED BY PRIMARILY THE AMERICANS AND USING AMERICAN ARMS. 

THE FACT THAT THIS GENOCIDAL WAR HAS NOT BEEN STOPPED CAN NOT JUST BE EXPLAINED BY POINTING TO THE ZIONISTS OR ARAB COLLABORATORS. WE NEED TO ALSO POINT  THE FINGER AT THE GLOBALISTS AS ISRAHELL IS A ZIONIST COLONIAL SETTLER RACIST ANTI ARAB ANTI ISLAMIC REGIME. IT IS ALSO AS IT'S FLAG SIGNIFIES DREAMING OF A PAX JUDAICA ENSHRINED WITH THE CONCEPT OF A GREATER ISRAHELL. THIS MEANS IT IS A GLOBALIST JZ/FM SATANIC PROJECT. THE SUPPORTERS OF ISRAHELL CONVERGES THE MOST SATANIC DEATH CULT ANTI ARAB, ANTI-ISLAMIC AND AND ANTI-HUMAN FORCES ON THE PLANET.     

THIS SHOULD BE CALLED OUT FOR WHAT IT IS WHICH IS THE BLOODLUST OF FANATICAL BARBARIAN JEWISH ZIONISTS AND GLOBALISTS. THIS IS A WAR AGAINST HUMANITY AND ISRAHELL IS A THREAT TO WORLD PEACE. ISRAHELL HAS BEEN ALLOWED TO GO OUT OF CONTROL AND IS BEING FUNDED AS WE SPEAK TO DO AS IT PLEASES IN BROAD DAYLIGHT . ISRAHELL HAS TO BE STOPPED NOW AS IT IS TAKING THE WORLD TO ARMAGEDDON.

IT IS TIME FOR THE GLOBAL AXIS OF RESISTANCE TO CLOSE RANKS LOCALLY IN OCCUPIED FILISTEEN AND GLOBALLY TO GO FOR THE ONLY SUSTAINABLE AND JUST FINAL SOLUTION. THE ISRAHELL MONTROSITY NEEDS TO BE DISMANTLED TOTALLY AND A JUST DIVINE ORDER ESTABLISHED IN THE HOLY LAND.

HASBUNALLAH














ISRAELI SETTLERS STORM AL AQSA MOSQUE ON SECOND DAY OF JEWISH PASSOVER
The Israeli occupation forces are heavily mobilized in Al-Aqsa Mosque in a bid to provide protection for the illegal Israeli settlers storming the holy site.
https://english.almayadeen.net/news/poli...-of-jewish
Reply
#93
MUSLIMS MUST PREPARE FOR QUDS TO BECOME THE CAPITAL OF THE FORTHCOMING GLOBAL ISLAMIC KHALIPHATE



SACRED LAND IN THE QURAN AND HADITH AND ITS SYMBOLIC AND ESCHATOLOGICAL SIGNIFICANCE
https://jsr.shanti.virginia.edu/back-iss...nificance/
Reply
#94














BEN-GVIR VIOLATES STATUS OF AL AQSA MOSQUE, CLAIMS SOVEREIGNTY
https://english.almayadeen.net/news/poli...-sovereign
Reply
#95
Reply
#96



Reply
#97



















[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NEYEcAd-tzQ][/url]


SHEIKH IZZ AD DIN AL QASSAM:
A LEGACY OF ANTI-COLONIAL ACTIVISM AND RESISTANCE
https://ilkha.com/english/analysis/sheik...nce-364896


GREAT ARAB REVOLT
1936-1939 A POPULAR UPRISING FACING A RUTHLESS REPRESSION
https://www.palquest.org/en/highlight/15...-1936-1939

In 1936, widespread Palestinian dissatisfaction with Britain's governance erupted into open rebellion. Several key dynamics and events can be seen as setting the stage for this uprising. In Palestine, as elsewhere, the 1930s had been a time of intense economic disruption. Rural Palestinians were hit hard by debt and dispossession, and such pressures were only exacerbated by British policies and Zionist imperatives of land purchases and “Hebrew labor.” Rural to urban migration swelled Haifa and Jaffa with poor Palestinians in search of work, and new attendant forms of political organizing emerged that emphasized youth, religion, class, and ideology over older elite-based structures. Meanwhile, rising anti-Semitism—especially its state-supported variant—in Europe led to an increase of Jewish immigration, legal and illegal, in Palestine.

Unsurprisingly, the combination of these various trends produced periodic upheavals, from the 1929 al-Buraq Uprising to multicity demonstrations in 1933 against the British Mandate. In October 1935, the discovery of a shipment of arms in the Jaffa port destined for the Haganah fueled Palestinian concerns that the Zionist movement was introducing the human and military resources necessary for its state-building project under the nose of the British. Meanwhile, the popular and populist Syrian Shaykh Izzeddin al-Qassam , who preached to the slum-dwelling rural transplants near Haifa's rail yards and who had spent the early 1930s building a cell-based paramilitary network, was killed in a firefight with British forces in November 1935. Qassam's funeral in Haifa elicited a mass outpouring of public outrage. These events are often seen as direct predecessors of the mass Palestinian uprising that took place in 1936.

The Great Palestinian Rebellion , or the Great Arab Revolt, as this uprising came to be known, lasted for three years and can be generally divided into three phases. The first phase lasted from the spring of 1936 to July 1937. With tensions throughout Palestine running high since the fall of 1935, the revolt was ignited in mid-April 1936 when followers of Qassam attacked a convoy of trucks between Nablus and Tulkarm , killing two Jewish drivers. The next day, the Irgun killed two Palestinian workers near Petah Tikva , and in the following days, deadly disturbances ensued in Tel Aviv and Jaffa. In Nablus, an Arab National Committee was formed and a strike was called on 19 April. National Committees in other cities echoed the call to strike, and on 25 April the Arab Higher Committee (Lajna) (AHC) was formed, chaired by Haj Amin al-Husseini , to coordinate and support a nationwide general strike, which was launched on 8 May.

The strike was widely observed and brought commercial and economic activity in the Palestinian sector to a standstill. Meanwhile, Palestinians throughout the countryside came together in armed groups to attack—at first sporadically, but with increasing organization— British and Zionist targets. Some Arab volunteers joined the rebels from outside Palestine, though their numbers remained small in this period. The British employed various tactics in an attempt to break the strike and to quell the rural insurrection. The ranks of British and Jewish policemen swelled and Palestinians were subjected to house searches, night raids, beatings, imprisonment, torture, and deportation. Large areas of Jaffa's Old City were demolished and the British called in military reinforcements.

Concurrent with military operations and repressive measures, the British government dispatched a commission of inquiry headed by Lord Peel to investigate the root causes of the revolt. In October 1936, under the combined pressure of British policies, other Arab heads of state, and the effects of a six-month general strike on the Palestinian population, the AHC called off the strike and agreed to appear before the Peel Commission . A period of lower intensity conflict prevailed as the Peel Commission toured the country, but tensions continued to build in anticipation of the commission's report. In July 1937, the Peel Commission published its report, recommending Palestine's partition into Jewish and Arab states. Dismayed by this negation of their desires and demands, the Palestinian population relaunched their armed insurgency with renewed intensity, initiating the second phase of the revolt.

This second phase, lasting from July 1937 until the fall of 1938, witnessed significant gains by the Palestinian rebels. Large swaths of the hilly Palestinian interior, including for a time the Old City of Jerusalem , fell fully under rebel control. Rebels established institutions, most significantly courts and a postal service, to replace the British Mandate structures they sought to dismantle. The British, meanwhile, imposed even harsher measures to try to quash the revolt. The AHC and all Palestinian political parties were outlawed, political and community leaders were arrested, and a number of high-profile public figures exiled. The military aspects of counterinsurgency intensified, and British tanks, airplanes, and heavy artillery were deployed throughout Palestine. The British also meted out collective punishment: thousands of Palestinians were relegated to “detention camps”; residential quarters were destroyed; schools were closed; villages were collectively fined and forced to billet British troops and police. Zionist military institutions took advantage of the situation to build up their capacities with British support. By early 1939, members of the Jewish Settlement Police (about 14,000) were subsidized, uniformed, and armed by the British government as a thinly veiled front for the Haganah, and so-called Special Night Squads  comprising Jewish and British members launched “special operations” against Palestinian villages.

The third phase of the rebellion lasted roughly from the fall of 1938 to the summer of 1939. The British dispatched another commission of inquiry, this one headed by Sir John Woodhead , to examine the technical aspects of implementing partition. In November 1938, the Woodhead Commission report concluded that partition was not practicable, marking a certain British retreat from the Peel recommendation. At the same time, however, the British launched an all-out offensive: in 1939 more Palestinians were killed, more were executed (by hanging), and nearly twice as many were detained than in 1938. Such brutality placed immense pressure on the rebels, exacerbating rifts between the political leadership of the AHC exiled in Damascus and local leadership on the ground, between rebel bands and village populations that were expected to support and supply them, and ultimately between Palestinians who remained committed to the revolt and those willing to reach a compromise with the British. British-supported Palestinian “Peace Bands” were dispatched to battle their compatriots.

In May 1939, the British government published a new White Paper that proposed the following: Britain's obligations to the Jewish national home had been substantially fulfilled; indefinite mass Jewish immigration to and land acquisition in Palestine would contradict Britain's obligations to the Palestinians; within the next five years, no more than 75,000 Jews would be allowed into the country, after which Jewish immigration would be subject to “Arab acquiescence”; land transfers would be permitted in certain areas, but restricted and prohibited in others, to protect Palestinians from landlessness; and an independent unitary state would be established after ten years, conditional on favorable Palestinian-Jewish relations.

The combined impact of Britain's military and diplomatic efforts brought the rebellion to an end in the late summer of 1939. Over the revolt's three years, some 5,000 Palestinians had been killed and nearly 15,000 wounded. The Palestinian leadership had been exiled, assassinated, imprisoned, and made to turn against one another. At the same time, the White Paper—despite its limitations—offered certain concessions to the rebels' demands. Whatever gains Palestinians might have made through the revolt, however, were quickly overtaken by the larger geopolitical processes of World War II , and the combined British-Zionist assault on Palestinian political and social life during the revolt had a long-lasting impact.


Alex Winder
Selected Bibliography: 
Anderson, Charles W. "State of Formation from Below and the Great Revolt in Palestine." Journal of Palestine Studies 47, no. 1 (Autumn 2017): 39-55.
Hughes, Matthew. “From Law and Order to Pacification: Britain's Suppression of the 1936–1939 Arab Revolt in Palestine.Journal of Palestine Studies 39, no.2 (Winter 2010): 6–22.
Kanafani, Ghassan. The 1936–39 Revolt in Palestine.
Shbeib, Samih. “Poetry of Rebellion: The Life, Verse and Death of Nuh Ibrahim during the 1936–39 Revolt.Jerusalem Quarterly 25 (Winter 2006): 65–78.
Sufian, Sandy. “Anatomy of the 1936-39 Revolt: Images of the Body in Political Cartoons of Mandatory Palestine.Journal of Palestine Studies 37, no.2 (Winter 2008):  23–42.
Swedenburg, Ted. Memories of Revolt: The 1936–1939 Rebellion and the Palestinian National Past. Fayetteville: University of Arkansas Press, 2003.
Reply
#98
























EXTREMIST ISRAELI MINISTERS STORM JERUSALEM's AQSA MOSQUE
https://english.wafa.ps/Pages/Details/148013


ARAB COUNTRIES CONDEMN ISRAELI SETTLER INCURSION INTO JERUSALEM’s Al-AQSA MOSQUE
https://www.aa.com.tr/en/middle-east/ara...qsa-mosque


2 ISRAELI MINISTERS JOIN ILLEGAL SETTLERS IN STORMING OF AL AQSA MOSQUE COMPOUND
https://www.aa.com.tr/en/middle-east/2-i...nd/3302608
‘Our policy is to allow (Jewish) prayer’ at Al-Aqsa Mosque, Ben-Gvir says, prompting Netanyahu's office to say his statement is in violation of status quo there



ISRAELI GOVERNMENT TO FINANCE STORMING OF AL AQSA 
BY ILLEGAL COLONISTS
https://english.wafa.ps/Pages/Details/148488

BEN-GVIR SAYS WOULD BUILD SYNAGOGUE ON AL AQSA MOSQUE COMPOUND
https://english.almayadeen.net/news/poli...que-compou

BEN-GVIR REPRESENTS 'TERRORISTS' IN ISRAELI GOVERNMENT
https://english.almayadeen.net/news/poli...-governmen
Reply
#99
WE ALL THINK WE KNOW WHAT AL AQSA IS OR DO WE?   DID YOU KNOW THAT IN THIS SACRED COMPOUND THERE ARE 5 MOSQUES. YES 5.   ALSO WHAT IS THE CONNECTION BETWEEN MUHAMMAH(pbuh) , BURAQ, MARYAM(MARY), ISA(JESUS), IBRAHIM(ABRAHAM), DAUD(DAVID), MUSA(MOSES), SULAYMAN(SOLOMON) AS WELL AS EARTH AND HEAVEN?  ALSO WHY IS FILISTEEN THE ISLAMIC AND MONOTHEISTIC HOLY LAND?     


FURTHERMORE AS WE ARE LIVING IN A TIME WHEN THE WAR FOR FREEDOM AND LIBERATION OF OCCUPIED GAZA AND FILISTEEN IS BEING WITNESSED AND LIVE STREAMED GLOBALLY. THIS IS A TRULY EPIC STRUGGLE OF IMMENSE PROPORTIONS. GLOBAL ISLAM NEEDS TO LEARN LESSONS FROM SALAHUDDIN, NURUDDIN AND ZENGI WHO LIBERATED THE HOLY LAND FROM THE LATIN CRUSADERS.  BUT GLOBAL ISLAM DOES NOT JUST NEED HISTORY LESSONS BUT APPLY THE LESSONS TO OUR CONTEMPORARY REALITY AND CHALLENGES. 



THIS WILL BE REHEARSED.






















































ZIONIST THREATS TO AL AQSA AND ITS IMPLICATIONS
https://crescent.icit-digital.org/articl...plications

As the zionist regime continues to expand its acts of aggression beyond Gaza into the occupied-West Bank and intensifies its war with Hizbullah in Lebanon, the symbolic and root cause of October 7, 2023 resistance operation still remains as relevant as ever.

That is to say the escalations surrounding the Aqsa Mosque compound in al-Quds/Jerusalem have heightened tensions, with significant implications for the region. Zionist threats to Al-Aqsa, particularly calls to alter its status and the provocative statements from Israeli far-right figures, suggest a broader agenda that ties into ongoing resistance efforts, namely the Hamas-led “Al-Aqsa Storm” operation, now nearing its one-year mark.

Recent months have seen increased calls by Israeli officials and far-right settler groups to allow Jewish prayer at Al-Aqsa, which directly challenges the long-standing agreement regarding the site’s administration.

Under the current arrangement, which dates back to the post-1967 period, only Muslims are permitted to pray within the mosque compound, while non-Muslims may visit under strict guidelines. Yet, figures like Israel’s far-right National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir have repeatedly pushed for changes to this arrangement.

In August, Ben-Gvir restated his desire for a synagogue to be built at the site, calling for Jewish prayer rights within the compound, a stance widely seen as an attempt to “Judaize” the sacred space and city.

These statements have been met with fierce condemnation from across the Arab and Muslim worlds. States in the region have decried the move as a dangerous provocation that risks inflaming religious tensions.

Jordan, which supposedly serves as the custodian of Islamic holy sites in Al-Quds/Jerusalem, emphasized its responsibility to defend the mosque and has hinted at taking legal action in international courts to halt these provocations and even taking the issue up with the UN Security Council.

This followed Ben-Gvir’s provocative comments and reports that the occupation state’s “Ministry of Heritage” intends to fund tours for Jews and zionist tourists to the compound, with Israeli police having approved the plans, according to public broadcaster Kan.

Back in June, following the so-called Flag March, Iran’s foreign ministry also condemned the desecration of the mosque, stating that:

“The child-killing and occupying Israeli regime has been isolated in the world more than ever, and such measures will definitely make the regime more isolated and hateful”, the Iranian diplomat said, calling on Muslim countries to maintain unity in order to counter Israeli crimes against the Palestinian people.”

The heightened tension at Al-Aqsa is not just a local issue. It connects to broader movements and resistance efforts, not just Hamas and other Palestinian factions, but the region’s Resistance Axis. The “Aqsa Storm” operation, launched almost a year ago, aimed to highlight the centrality of Al-Quds/Jerusalem and the sacred mosque in the Palestinian struggle.

This campaign, which began as a military response to ongoing land-grabbing and annexation by the occupation entity, quickly expanded to emphasize the protection of Al-Aqsa and the broader goal of resisting zionist control over East Jerusalem.

As early as late October 2023, the same month in which the resistance operation was launched, an official of Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ) described the centrality of Al-Aqsa Mosque in the operation, stating:

“The goal of ‘Al-Aqsa Storm’ operation has been declared from the beginning, which is to prevent the targeting of Al-Aqsa Mosque (in Jerusalem), disparaging or insulting of Muslim religious rites, assault of our women, efforts to Judaize Al-Aqsa Mosque and normalize Israeli occupation of it, or divide it temporally and spatially.”

“This is what the enemy was working to do continuously, which is why the operation was named “Al-Aqsa Storm,” he added.

For these Palestinian factions, the fight for Al-Aqsa represents more than just a battle for a piece of land; it is a symbol of the larger Palestinian resistance against the occupation of one of Islam’s holiest sites. The operation was explicitly framed as part of a long-term resistance strategy, with Hamas warning that continued provocations at Al-Aqsa would be a “dangerous escalation.”
In a recent statement in September, Hamas criticized Tel Aviv’s tacit support of extremist groups that seek to demolish Al-Aqsa. “We call on our Palestinian people in Jerusalem, the West Bank and the occupied interior [Israel] to travel to the blessed Al-Aqsa Mosque and defend it,” the movement said.

The current provocations at Al-Aqsa also feed into the broader context of Israel’s occupation of East Jerusalem and its wider settlement policies. Palestinians and most of the international community view East Jerusalem, including Al-Aqsa, as the future capital of a Palestinian state. Any attempt to alter the status quo of the mosque or its surrounding areas is therefore seen as an effort to entrench Israeli control and weaken Palestinian and Islamic claims to the city.
This issue is further complicated by the growing influence of far-right (even by Israeli standards) politicians, many of whom explicitly call for greater Jewish access to and control over Al-Aqsa, exacerbates these tensions. With the rise of these elements within Israeli politics, the possibility of further escalations looms large.

As we approach the one-year anniversary of Al-Aqsa Storm operation, it becomes clear that the conflict over Al-Aqsa is more than just a local issue. It represents a battleground for broader political, religious, and ideological struggles.

Zionist threats to the mosque compound, particularly the push for Jewish prayer rights and the potential construction of a synagogue, are seen by Palestinians and the wider Muslim world as an affront to their religious rights and a step toward the full Judaization of Al-Quds/ Jerusalem.
This issue remains central in the current war, now undoubtedly a regional one, with Al-Aqsa symbolizing the enduring struggle for Palestinian self-determination and resistance. The continued provocations threaten to fuel further violence, potentially sparking a larger religious war, as Palestinian leaders have warned. With resistance groups framing their efforts as a defence of Al-Aqsa, the mosque remains at the heart of the conflict, and its future will likely continue to be a flashpoint in the region.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 5 Guest(s)