Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
UNITED STATES OF ISLAM ARMY
#1
WORLD EXCLUSIVE  

IT HAS BECOME CLEAR THAT ONE OF THE FACTORS OF DECLINE IN MUSLIM POWER IN THE MODERN ERA ESPECIALLY COMPARED TO THE EUROPEANS WAS FALLING BACK IN TERMS OF WAR PREPAREDNESS. EVERYTHING FROM MILITARY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, WEOPONS, MILITARY-INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX, TRAINING , MILITARY DOCTRINE AND 6TH GENERATION WARFARE. THIS EXPLAINS THE RISE OF EUROPEAN AND AMERICAN EMPIRES AS WELL AS THE USE OF EMPIRE TO SUPPORT THEIR CURRENCIES IMPERIALISM THAT IS WHY WE USE THE TERM IMPERIAL DOLLAR. THE UMMAH NEEDS TO BREAK THE NONMUSLIM MONOPOLY AND LEADERSHIP IN THIS DOMAIN IF IT IS GOING TO ATTAIN TRUE AND COMPLETE INDEPENDENCE AND NON SUBSERVIENCE  TO THESE WORLD POWERS.  THE RESURRECTION AND ESTABLISHMENT OF THE KHILAFAH AND KHALIFATE WILL REPLACE THE DOCTRINE OF MIGHT IS RIGHT AND WHITE IS RIGHT WITH AN UNIVERSAL DOCTRINE AND RULE OF UNIVERSAL JUSTICE . GLOBAL VISION 2000 WILL CHART THE RISE AND TRANSFORMATION REQUIRED AND ACTUALLY EVOLVING IN THE MUSLIM WORLD TOWARDS A UNITED  STATES OF ISLAM ARMY.   EVEN IN THE LAST WORLD WAR WW2 WHICH WAS AN EUROPEAN CIVIL WAR MUSLIM ARMIES WERE EXTENSIVELY USED TO FIGHT BATTLES OF AND FOR NONMULIMS. MUSLIM BLOOD WAS ILLEGALLY EXPENDED FUTILELY AND THIS IS NOT FULLY ACKNOWLEDGED EVEN TODAY. THIS CAN NOT AND MUST BE REPEATED IN ANY FUTURE WORLD CONFLICT AND THE UMMAH MUST REORIENTATE AND RESTRUCTURE ITSELF TO MOVE ITSELF IN THIS DIRECTION. GLOBAL VISION 2000 WILL PROVIDE THE VISION FOR THIS TO BECOME A REALITY.  >>>>>>>>>>>>>  


TURKISH NEWSPAPER CLOSE TO ERDOGAN CALLS TO FORM JOINT ISLAMIC ARMY TO FIGHT ISRAEL 

SADAT
http://www.sadat.com.tr/download/SADAT-eng-full-v02.pdf
http://www.sadat.com.tr/about-us/our-publications.html



PAKISTAN WILL NEVER AGAIN FIGHT SOMEONE ELSE'S WAR
PM KHAN VOWS DURING DEFENCE DAY SPEECH   

IMRAN KHAN SPEECH AT GHQ WHILE ATTENDING CEREMONY
OF DEFENCE DAY


GENERAL QAMAR BAJWA SPEECH AT GHQ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kfgjkV6QjFs



GHQ CEREMONY : GENERAL RAHEEL HANDS OVER CONTROL 
OF PAKISTAN ARMY TO GENERAL QAMAR BAJWA 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A_x1zAuPrbM


FIRST TIME FROM PAKISTAN MILITARY ACADEMY KAKUL 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h3UfhC4eXQ0



TUM HI SE AYE MUJAHIDO 2018
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mG8h_53CR98


NARA E TAKBEER ALLAH O AKBAR PAKISTAN ARMY SONG 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7GBwWyiKgQ0


PAKISTAN DAY PARADE  
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e3ZcKOmq4UE


PAKISTAN AIRFORCE SONG | TRIBUTE  
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-913MB7zNoE


IRON BROTHERS SHOW OF AEROBATICS
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9mdTnqC0WOM


PAKISTAN DEFENCE SYSTEM  
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3losfjQ5pn0



FIFTH GENERATION WAR  
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L3YDFf9an6w


HOW DID PAKISTAN BECOME A NUCLEAR POWER?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T647T-P05Qg


PAKISTAN AERONAUTICAL COMPLEX
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g0HUovAQhJM


JF 17 THUNDER FROM A NEW PERSPECTIVE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aDIXwFKKmHk 


PAKISTAN IS DEVELOPING 5th GENERATION FIGHTER AIRCRAFT AND MAKE UAV UNDER PROJECT AZM 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HwEipNLahdo

PAKISTAN'S MISSILE TECHNOLOGY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yvOFwn3Lxxw
Reply
#2
THE ENEMIES OF ISLAM AND MUSLIMS ARE ENGAGED IN A 6TH GENERATION WAR OF AGGRESSION AND HEGEMONY WHICH WILL BE EXPOSED. THE TIME FOR THE UNITED STATES OF ISLAM ARMY TO BE MATERIALISED AND COME ON THE WORLD STAGE HAS ARRIVED. IT IS TIME FOR ANY NATION OR CIVILISATION TO REALISE THAT THERE IS A NEED TO DIFFERENTIATE BETWEEN PLEADING WITH THOSE WHO THINK MIGHT IS RIGHT AND MOBILISING YOUR OWN RESOURCES AND STRENGTH AND DEALING WITH THEM AS EQUALS AS THAT IS THE ONLY LANGUAGE THEY SPEAK AND UNDERSTAND. NO MATTER HOW DETESTABLE TO SOME THERE IS A NEED TO RECOGNISE ISLAM IS NOT AGAINST WAR PER SE AS THERE IS THE BELIEF AND PRACTICE OF A JUST WAR IN SELF DEFENCE AND AGAINST OPPRESSION. INDEED SOME SCHOLARS WOULD ARGUE THAT THIS IS IS THE 6TH PILLAR OF ISLAM. THE TIME FOR  PACIFISTS, COWARDS AND TRAITORS TO GET OUT OF THE ROAD HAS ARRIVED.  THE DOCTRINE OF JIHAD AND ITS RESURRECTION NEEDS ATTENTION AS MANY QUARTERS HAVE ABUSED AND MISUSED IT FOR THEIR OWN PURPOSES.     



PAKISTAN IS PREPARED FOR WAR : DG ISPR ON INDIAN ARMY CHIEF's STATEMENT| 22 Sep 2018 | 92NewsHD
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cSVZez-iXoI 



PERVEZ MUSHARRAF RESPONSE TO INDIAN ARMY CHIEF ABOUT STATEMENT ON PAKISTAN 

Pervez Musharaf Interview
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DOfcHYQUt-E



US RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTINUANCE OF TERRORISM IN WORLD : IRAN 
https://www.presstv.com/Detail/2018/09/2...ment-Ahvaz


ROUHANI: IRAN READY TO CONFRONT US, 'SMALL MERCENARY STATES'


"Americans want Iran to have no security. They want to create chaos and turmoil and set the conditions so that they can return to the country one day and take charge as they did in the old days, but none of these is possible," the president said.

"These are unattainable dreams and America will never achieve any of these goals," Rouhani added.  He touched on Washington's hostile policies toward Iran, including its withdrawal from an international nuclear deal with Tehran under "delusional excuses," putting a nation under strain.  "Our people will resist and the government has prepared itself for this confrontation," he said, adding that everyone will "join hands to put these difficult times behind us with the grace of God."  "The Americans will regret what they did because they made a very wrong choice", the president added.  Rouhani also said the US is provoking regional states against Iran, citing the terrorist attack in Ahvaz, which also left scores of people, including women and children, injured.  "It is entirely clear to us who did it, who they are and where they are affiliated to," he said.  "The sponsor of all these small mercenary countries in the region is America. Americans are provoking them and providing the right conditions for them to commit these crimes," Rouhani added.  The president said these acts will have no effect on the will and direction of the Iranian nation which "has stood up and resisted much bigger crimes."

Terrorists opened fire on people watching a military parade held to mark the invasion of Iran by former Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein during the 1980s.

The Saudi-backed al-Ahvaziya terror group, which is based in Europe, has claimed responsibility for the assault. 

PressTV-Terrorists attack military parade in Iran's Ahvaz


Rouhani said as long as Saddam was alive, the group used to be a mercenary of the former Ba'ath regime, but they switched their fealty to a "southern Persian Gulf state" which has undertaken to provide the terrorists with funds, weapons and political assistance.   


Rouhani described the Saturday attack, especially in a city which "valiantly withstood eight years" of attacks by Saddam's forces, a "big crime" which will not go unpunished.  

"Iran's answer to these crimes will be within the framework of law and the country's national interests," he said as he paid tribute to the residents of Ahvaz.



Trump lawyer calls for 'revolution' in Iran



IRGC VOWS 'UNFORGETTABLE' REVENGE FOR AHVAZ TERROR ATTACK
https://www.presstv.com/Detail/2018/09/2...telligence

An Iranian soldier carries an infant away from a terrorist attack in the southwestern city of Ahvaz on September 22, 2018 Photo by Mehr News Agency

Iran’s Islamic Revolution Guards Corps (IRGC) says the terrorists behind a bloody attack in the southwestern city of Ahvaz will definitely face "deadly and unforgettable" revenge in the near future.  In a statement on Sunday, the IRGC expressed its sympathy with the bereaved families of the victims of the terrorist attack on a military parade in Ahvaz on Saturday, which killed at least 25 people and injured more than 60 others.




The Leader said the "tragic and sorrowful" incident in Ahvaz and the killing of people by mercenary terrorists once again exposed the cruelty of the enemies of the Iranian nation. Iranian President Hassan Rouhani also said on Saturday that the Islamic Republic would give a "crushing" response to the slightest threat against the country.



"Those who are providing these terrorists with propaganda and intelligence support must be held accountable," Rouhani said. Crushing response awaiting Ahvaz attack plotters: Intelligence Minister.  In a related development, Iran's Intelligence Minister Mahmoud Alavi said on Sunday that the country's security forces would give a "crushing response to the masterminds behind this inhumane measure" in Ahvaz.

He added that the mercenary terrorists carried out the blind attack in Ahvaz and killed innocent people in an effort to make up for repeated failure of their masters in Iraq, Syria and other countries.  Alavi said the terrorist attack, which was backed by foreign powers and their regional puppets in order to create insecurity in Iran, would bear no fruit and would fail to undermine the Iranian nation's power and coherence.[/size][/b][/align]

The al-Ahwaziya terror group, whose recruits are believed to be scattered in several European countries, including in the Netherlands and Denmark, claimed responsibility for the attack.  The terror outfit, which is backed by Saudi Arabia, has a record of carrying out acts of sabotage in Iran’s Khuzestan Province, which encompasses Ahvaz and some other dominantly Arab cities.
Reply
#3
AS WE ARE AT THE DAWN OF THE NEW ERA IN WORLD CIVILISATION  PAX ISLAMICA AND GLOBAL ISLAM'S MILITARY LEADERSHIP HAS TO PREPARE TO TAKE CENTRE STAGE. THERE WILL BE A REVIEW OF MILITARY LEADERS, MILITARY LEADERSHIP AND MILITARY DOCTRINE HEREWITH AS THERE IS A NEED FOR A NEW MODEL. THIS IS REQUIRED  AS THE KHILAFA WILL ALSO BE THE AMIR AL MUMINEEN- COMMANDER IN CHIEF.
    

WHO WILL BE THE NEXT ARMY CHIEF 
https://www.dawn.com/news/1277442/who-wi...army-chief


ARMY TOP BRASS REVIEWS GEO-STRATEGIC ENVIROMENT, SECURITY SITUATION 
https://www.thenews.com.pk/latest/375338...-situation
Reply
#4
MESA: THE ARABIAN NATO ?
Arabian military alliance to bring more petro-capital to imperial purveyors of war


Uncle Sam and nephew Moshe are always scheming new ways to squeeze more money out of Arabian rulers. Playing on their fears borne of insecurity, hundreds of billions of dollars have been squeezed out of them over the last two decades by selling them weapons. The ill-trained and ill-motivated Arabian armies cannot use most of these weapons. But more sales are in the pipeline.

There is little evidence that these regimes feel any more secure by acquiring vast quantities of weapons than they did without them. If massive purchases of weapons cannot buy them security, what else can they do?  Uncle Sam has come up with another idea: the Middle East Strategic Alliance (MESA). There is nothing strategic about the new alliance that would comprise the six members of the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) plus Egypt and Jordan. The US would act as godfather and supervise the quarrelling potentates to prevent them from coming to blows with each other.


The idea of creating MESA is not entirely new. It is a modified version of the “Arab NATO” that had been talked about even before Donald Trump’s visit to Saudi Arabia in May 2017. As is customary with many of his hare-brained ideas that he periodically throws up, Saudi Crown Prince Muhammad bin Salman had proposed the establishment of an Islamic army to “fight terrorism.” He even recruited the former Pakistani army chief General Raheel Sharif to head this army. Various reports say he is paid a six-digit salary in US dollars; not a bad deal for doing virtually nothing!



The problem with the “Islamic army” is that there is no army despite Bin Salman proposing an alliance of 34 countries. The alliance pointedly excluded Islamic Iran, Iraq, and Syria — three countries most severely affected by terrorism. Since the election of Mahathir Muhammad as prime minister, Malaysia has also pulled out of the so-called alliance. Indonesia had already said it would not send troops for the proposed “Islamic army.”



There is a simple solution to fighting terrorism: Saudi Arabia, Zionist Israel, and imperialist America should stop supporting and arming terrorists masquerading as rebels, insurgents, or freedom fighters. In mid-September, there were reports that Abu Bakr al Baghdadi, the self-styled khalifah of the terrorist outfit Da‘ish or ISIS (or whatever other four-letter-word it is known by) had relocated to Afghanistan. Fleeing Syria would not have been possible without direct US help. Both the Russians and Afghans (former president Hamid Karzai, for instance) have publicly stated that Da‘ish terrorists have been airlifted to Afghanistan in “unmarked” helicopters. This was a broad hint that the Americans did it.



But back to the idea of MESA or “Arab NATO” or whatever other fancy label is attached to it. Taking advantage of the presence of so many Arabian rulers or foreign ministers in New York for the 73rd session of the United Nations General Assembly in September, US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo gathered them to deliver a stern lecture about “working together.” This was the first time that all six members of the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) sat under one roof after the Saudi-led blockade of Qatar was launched in June 2017. The blockade had US blessing. Others at the September 28 meeting in New York were representatives of Egypt and Jordan — both basket cases looking for financial handouts.


But here is the rub. On his Saudi visit last year, Trump had announced arms deals worth some $350 billion. Soon thereafter, the US also sold $12 billion worth of helicopters to Qatar. On September 29, Trump even announced that he had told the Saudi king that since they have “trillions of dollars” — yes trillions with a “T” — they must give this money to the US. The Najdi Bedouins, it seems, would soon be heading back to the desert!




Egyptian President ‘Abd al-Fattah al-Sisi, Saudi King Salman, and US President Donald Trump visit the Global Center for Combating Extremist Ideology, in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, 5-20-2017, the occasion where the US chief executive announced his plans for an “Arab NATO.” Any serious security alliance involving the United States in the Muslim East will not happen without Israeli oversight, full participation, and approval. This means that for all the other “Sunni” regimes to tag along as cannon fodder, Bani Saud will have to deal openly with Israel — the only credible, if unofficial, military presence in MESA — if the alliance is to have any real credibility, to wit all the not-so-secret overtures from Arabia to Israel that have been taking place under pressure from the Trump administration and the rising principled influence of Iran.



The Saudi-Qatari spat, entirely artificial, shows how the US operates: first create a crisis and then milk both sides of the dispute. The only exception is Zionist Israel whose implantation in the heart of the Muslim East is the source of all instability. While the US rakes in tens of billions of dollars annually from Arabian potentates, Zionist Israel gets billions in free arms and other handouts.


The imperialist-Zionist duo is talking up the alleged threat from Islamic Iran. For the record, Iran has not attacked any country in 250 years. It desires peace and good neighborliness with all regional countries. The only exception is Zionist Israel, that usurper entity illegally squatting on Palestinian land.  



The Arabian potentates backed by the US, Israel, and Europe even tried to destroy the Islamic Republic through the eight-year war that was launched in September 1980 but they failed. Islamic Iran valiantly defended its land, integrity and honor.


The imperialists and Zionists have sold the diabolical plot to the Arabian potentates that Islamic Iran is a greater threat to them than Zionist Israel. In what would make sense only in an upside-down world, this is true. Israel would not survive without the presence of the illegitimate Arabian regimes. David Ben Gurion, Israel’s first prime minister, had admitted in a moment of candor that the Arabian regimes are Israel’s first line of defence!



In pursuit of the MESA idea, the US is planning a high-level meeting with Arabian dictators in January. The aim, according to a senior US official, is to speed up forging an alliance whose principal aim would be to confront Islamic Iran. 


Tim Lenderking, US Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Arabian (sic) Gulf Affairs, toured the region in August and September to drum up support for MESA — a concept not dissimilar to the Arabian NATO. “The more we have coordinated efforts, the more effective in enhancing stability,” Lenderking told Emirati website The National on September 26, calling Iran the “number one threat” on the MESA list. Cyber attacks, conflict management, and Syria and Yemen were also thrown in for good measure. In both Syria and Yemen, the aggressors have failed and their policies are falling apart. It is, however, internal conflicts among these potentates that are most problematic. They behave like children, friends one moment and mortal enemies the next and at each other’s throats. The acquisitiveness of the material rather than the aspiration for the moral is endemic to this kind of fratricidal infighting.


With its militaristic policies in the region falling apart, Washington seems to be in a hurry to establish MESA as another mischief-making tool. “We [US] would like to agree on the concept of MESA by the January [2019] summit,” Lenderking said, adding that the US was “flexible” on the date given the talks were still in the early stages. “Flexibility” is also necessary because of the fickleness of Arabian rulers. Lenderking acknowledged the ongoing rift between Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, the UAE and Egypt on the one hand and Qatar on the other. Pompeo’s September 28 meeting in New York failed to resolve these differences.

“In the long term, with the MESA that we envision, it would be hard to have two or three countries in this alliance in this kind of confrontation,” Lenderking admitted. “We can continue to develop the concept and work on some of the pillars but ultimately you have to see the rift de-escalated.”

The bottom line of all these manouvres is to protect Zionist Israel. Along the way, the US wants to make tons of money by selling useless weapons to the incompetent Arabian armies that train their weapons only on hapless people, whether in Yemen or in their own oppressed societies.
Reply
#5
SIACHEN AND SIACHEN GLACIER IN DISPUTED KASHMIR IS THE WORLD'S LONGEST HIGH ALTITUDE WAR ZONE INVOLVING PAKISTAN, INDIA AND CHINA. THE UNDERLYING ISSUE IS THE DISPUTES BETWEEN NATIONS OVER BORDERS DEMARCATED BY FORMER EUROPEAN COLONIAL POWERS IN THIS CASE BY THE BRITISH. THIS IS JUST ONE OF MANY EXAMPLES IN THE MUSLIM WORLD OF THE LEGACIES OF IMPERIALISM WHICH HAVE TO BE DEALT WITH. WHILST THE NWO HAS A GLOBAL ARCHITECTURE TO DEAL WITH DISPUTES IT CLEARLY HAS NOT BEEN ABLE TO RESOLVE THESE TERRITORIAL DISPUTES. SO THERE IS A NEED FOR OTHER SOLUTIONS AND THIS IS WHY THERE IS A NEED FOR A UNITED STATES OF ISLAM ARMY. FOR INSTANCE IF PAKISTAN AND IT'S ARMY WAS BACKED AND SUPPORTED BY THE MUSLIM UMMAH WOULD AGGRESSORS LIKE INDIA BACK OFF?  THE ANSWER IS SELF EVIDENT. SO BRING IT ON .    

SIACHEN: WILL THIS CONFLICT EVER END ?
Moeed Pirzada discusses with Lt. Gen. ® V.P. Raghawan, Lt. Gen. ® Syed Athar Ali, Tanveer Ahmed Khan (Former Foreign Secretary) and Ejaz Haider (Exec. Director, Jinnah Institute) 

GENERAL HAMEED GUL ON THE FUTURE OF PAKISTAN 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oaWTKO9M-pw
Reply
#6
PAKISTAN's MILITARY MIGHT ON DISPLAY AT IDEAS 2018 
https://tribune.com.pk/story/1856625/1-pakistans-military-might-display-ideas-2018

IRAN LAUNCHES MOST ADVANCED INDIGENOUS DESTROYER   


FOUR THINGS TO KNOW ABOUT TURKEY's UPCOMING SPACE PROGRAM 
Ankara announced that the country will have its own space agency that will focus on developing space technology that's in line with the government's policies.



NATIONAL DEFENCE UNIVERSITY 
Reply
#7
HYBRID WARFARE 
https://www.dawn.com/news/1450346/hybrid-warfare

THE 2018 IDEAS Expo in Karachi featured a high-level seminar on hybrid warfare. This was a timely recognition that threats to national security can and do assume complex forms.  For over 60 years, nuclear weapons have deterred a major conflict between nuclear-armed states, and, because of the global revulsion against the use of nuclear weapons, the nuclear powers have been also unable to realise offensive objectives through nuclear coercion, even against non-nuclear weapon states. Thus, most conflicts are in the form of conventional military interventions against smaller or weaker states, sub-conventional (guerrilla or irregular) conflicts or ‘hybrid warfare’.

Western analysts have termed the comprehensive approach employed by Russia in Ukraine (encompassing narrative control, cyberattacks, use of anonymous militias and irregular forces, clandestine supplies and diplomatic support) as “hybrid warfare”. The Russians refer to it as the ‘Gerasimov Doctrine’ (after the Russian military chief). This form of warfare is also called: asymmetrical, non-conventional, gray zone conflict, ‘new generation warfare’, ‘whole of government’ approach and so on. It is emerging as the preferred modality in today’s contests between the great powers.

Often, hybrid war may not be a war at all. The objective may not be to secure an adversary’s immediate defeat, but to erode its morale; isolate it; ‘soften’ it up before a conflict; deflect it from pursuing unacceptable military or political objectives; disrupt its communications, command and control and/or important infrastructure; impose economic pain to secure adherence to political demands; delegitimise an adversary’s government; compromise its leaders.  The objective may not be to secure an adversary’s immediate defeat, but to erode its morale. The toolbox of instruments that can be used to wage such ‘hybrid’ warfare is rapidly expanding and becoming more sophisticated: eg autonomous weapons, advanced cyber programmes, social media, data mining, algorithms and artificial intelligence (AI), etc. By 2020, the ‘internet of things’ will reportedly connect 30 billion devices. Power will rest with the people who control these devices.

Technology is progressively blurring the distinction between hybrid and conventional warfare and increasing the incentives, opportunities and compulsions for the preemptive or ‘first-use’ of offensive action by adversaries eg to knock out an enemy’s command and control through a cyber strike. Given the complexities of defence and offence in such complex conflict, it will become increasingly difficult to prevent the escalation of hybrid wars to the conventional and even the nuclear level.

Pakistan was the target of hybrid or indirect ‘war’ in 1971. New Delhi’s hybrid strategy (promotion of Mujib’s six-point plan, the genocide and refugees narrative, training the Mukti Bahini, the Indo-Soviet ‘Friendship Treaty’) all laid the ground for the coup de grâce of Indian military intervention in East Pakistan.

Since then, Pakistan has been the target of multiple ‘hybrid’ campaigns. Exaggerated proliferation concerns and coercive diplomacy were utilised to hold back Pakistan’s nuclear and missile programmes. The legitimacy of the Kashmiri freedom struggle was eroded by its projection as terrorism including through false-flag operations, infiltration of militant Kashmiri groups and concerted propaganda. The onus for America’s colossal military and political failure in Afghanistan was ascribed to alleged Afghan Taliban ‘safe havens’ in Pakistan. The Pakistan Army and the ISI remain a special focus of propaganda and fake news.  Today, the hybrid war against Pakistan is focused on Balochistan, the former Fata region, Gilgit-Baltistan and the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor.

Pakistan has developed credible capabilities to deter nuclear and conventional aggression. However, it remains very vulnerable to hybrid warfare. Pakistan’s adversaries enjoy considerable prowess in IT, cyber, media projection and narrative construction, including ‘fake news’, subversion and sabotage, and sponsorship of terrorism, including ‘false-flag’ operations.

The main modality of this ‘indirect war’ against Pakistan is the media, including social media. Very few Indian media personalities enjoy the ‘freedom’ to be critical of their country or their current government. Meanwhile, Pakistan print and electronic media speaks with many voices. There is little space for pro-Pakistani narratives in the Western media. An army of Indian trolls has been recruited to malign Pakistan on the internet.

There are numerous other ‘agents of influence’ who are used to develop and project an anti-Pakistan narrative. Many foreign funded and directed non-governmental organisations have been ubiquitous in developing negative critiques about Pakistan within Pakistan. Some among our local elite are co-opted by these organisations through jobs, travel and other perks. No wonder there has been such a hue and cry about the long overdue diligence conducted recently by the government and the Foreign Office on these organisations.  The hybrid campaign incorporates some ethnic and religious groups. Foreign sponsorship of the Balochistan Liberation Army and the Tehreek-i-Taliban Pakistan is well established. Some others need to be subjected to close scrutiny. Any foreign funding of any Pakistani organisation ought to be declared and officially approved. Receipt of undeclared foreign payments should be a crime. This is an international norm. (Surely, the Financial Action Task Force will approve.)

Pakistan’s agencies must be equipped with the most advanced surveillance and data collection techniques to detect future Jadhevs or Osamas and neutralise any ‘black ops’, ‘false-flag’ or infiltration operations planned by enemy agencies. Pakistan must possess the cyber capability to defend its crucial command-and-control systems and its industrial and transport infrastructure against enemy attack. But to deter such attack, Pakistan must also have the capability for offensive cyber action.

The technologies for waging a “comprehensive” conflict and “new generation warfare” are being actively developed by every significant State. Pakistan cannot afford to be left behind. To acquire credible capacity to defend against and repel hybrid wars, Pakistan will need to make dedicated efforts, comparable to those deployed to develop its nuclear and missile programmes.  However, there are certain elements of such warfare (cyberattacks, autonomous weapons, false-flag operations) which pose the threat of systemic and global disruption, destabilisation and military escalation. Pakistan and other responsible nations should take an initiative in relevant international forums to secure a global ban or restrictions on such dangerous elements of hybrid warfare.
Reply
#8
IRAN SOLE REGIONAL COUNTRY WITH ITS OWN SATELLITE LAUNCHERS
https://www.presstv.com/Detail/2019/01/1...ites-orbit

An official at the Iranian Space Agency (ISA) says the Islamic Republic is the sole country in the region actively producing satellite launchers as Tehran is getting ready to put two new satellites into orbit.

Speaking in a televised interview with the Iranian television, which was published on Monday, Seyyed Hossein Mousavi, an advisor to head of the ISA said the country will soon put Payam (Message) and Doosti (Friendship) satellites into orbit to prove its groundbreaking progress in the field of satellite technology and science.

“It is fortunate to say that we are in very good conditions in terms of developing satellite technology and launch among regional countries, and due to sanctions imposed on our country, our goal is to become self-sufficient in this field,” he said.

The official added that the Islamic Republic of Iran is the sole regional country active in the field of manufacturing satellite launchers in the region, seconded only by the Zionist regime in this regard.  He noted that Payam satellite, which is a product of researchers at Amir Kabir University of Technology, is capable of taking high-resolution images and will last in orbit for a period of two years.

Mousavi stated that the goal of producing Doosti satellite was mostly to promote satellite technology and knowledge in the country and transfer that technology to Iran.  Meanwhile, the official in charge of developing Payam satellite has high-precision cameras capable of taking photos with a precision of 40 meters, which can be then used for agricultural development purposes, studying vegetation and forests, silviculture and other peaceful goals.

The ISA’s deputy director for development of space services, Ali Sadeqi Naeini, said in an interview also published on Monday that the Iranian satellites will be put into an orbit 500 km above the Earth and are expected to last for two years.

He said the technology used to make the two satellites was totally home-grown, adding, “No foreign country has provided us with space technology and this is purely domestic know-how.”

The official noted that in terms of satellite design and manufacture technology, Iran currently ranks the first in the region and there are a high number of prominent Iranian specialists both within and without the country, who are internationally known for their expertise in the field of astronomy and space since.  Addressing a large crowd of people during his visit to Gonbad-e Kavous in the northern Iranian Golestan Province earlier on Monday, President Hassan Rouhani lauded Iran’s top rank in terms of its scientific standing, particularly in genetics, in the Middle East region.

He pointed out that the country will be placing two satellites into orbit in the coming days. Speaking to Reuters last Wednesday, Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif said Tehran will continue with its aerospace program despite US warnings, stressing there is no international law banning such a program.

His remarks came in reaction to warnings by US officials against Iran’s pursuing space rocket launches that Washington claims would violate a UN Security Council resolution, because they use ballistic missile technology.  Iranian Minister of Information and Communications Technology Mohammad Javad Azari Jahromi also said last Monday that Iran would ask no one’s permission to develop its peaceful aerospace program.

“Iran will ask no one’s permission to develop its peaceful aerospace industries and will firmly proceed with its plans,” he said.

He added that Iran had successfully made preparations for the launch of Payam and Doosti satellites and would do so upon an order by relevant officials.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)